Clueless about the origin of life


Click Here

Article reads: Exactly 20 years ago, I wrote an article for Scientific American that, in draft form, had the headline above. My editor nixed it, so we went with something less dramatic: “In the Beginning…: Scientists are having a hard time agreeing on when, where and—most important—how life first emerged on the earth.” That editor is gone now, so I get to use my old headline, which is even more apt today.

Me thinks: A two-aspect panpsychism, that comes with a middle-term (ineffable core), and agreeing with Taoism (more or less), Whitehead, Plotinus, and others, is about what I think is real to explain life`s origins. Still it would be nice to be able to demonstrate the Trinitarian transitions up through the elementary particles, to chemicals, to DNA, as predicted by the two-aspect model; that would be convincing! This models predicts transitions that agree with a Trinitarian unfolding because the process is believed (by me) to be dialectical and conforms with a universal grammar.
Post a comment or leave a trackback: Trackback URL.


  • Khalilah Horoschak  On March 6, 2011 at 6:29 am

    I’m extremely impressed with your writing skills and also with the layout on your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Either way keep up the nice quality writing, it is rare to see a great blog like this one today..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: